No tech oversight sought on glitchy NC health plan service
A state contract terminated last month after leaving thousands of state employees with "inactive" health insurance received no review from outside technology experts, despite a state law designed to require oversight for IT projects.
Posted — UpdatedIt's a case State Chief Information Officer Chris Estes calls a possible "gray area" in a law meant to ensure the state protects itself before beginning complex technology projects.
The state is working on returning the contract to a vendor it has worked with before. Officials expect to finalize a settlement with Aon Hewitt in the coming weeks.
Years before the deal with Aon Hewitt, though, officials with the State Health Plan did seek help from the Office of Information Technology Services. In 2011, plan officials asked OITS for state project managers to oversee contracts for the health plan's eligibility and enrollment services, which would be handled by an outside vendor.
But no one was qualified, according to the Treasurer's Office, and in late 2011, OITS told State Health Plan officials the project proposal wasn't technology-related enough to warrant the office's help.
That determination applied to the initial eligibility and enrollment services contract with Benefitfocus, which took the job in July 2013. After customer service problems with Benefitfocus prompted the state to switch to Aon Hewitt a little more than a year later, the Treasurer's Office used the same rationale.
"It is the view of the State Health Plan that the contract with Aon Hewitt for Eligibility and Enrollment Services was a contract for services and not primarily an information technology contract and did not require state Office of Information Technology Services approval or oversight," Johnson said in an email.
Estes, who took the helm of OITS in January 2014, said there's no real "bright line" separating a services contract from an IT contract.
"Every law has some gray area, and you may have found one," Estes said.
He said better defining the differences between types of contracts that need oversight is one area his office is working on. But because OITS played no role in the Aon contract, Estes said justifying the decision not to seek oversight would be up to officials with the State Health Plan.
"From their perspective, they probably thought they were following the process they were supposed to follow," Estes said. "I'm sure they had the best intentions."
Johnson said the Treasurer's Office couldn't speculate about whether additional oversight would have affected the outcome of the Aon Hewitt contract.
"The State Health Plan is committed to providing members the best customer service and will continue to hold vendors to the highest standards," he said in an email.
Related Topics
• Credits
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.